The (Missing) Role of Nuclear Energy in the Sustainable Development Goals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6632131Schlagworte:
Climate action, nuclear energy, renewable energy, sustainable development, SDGs, SDG 7, SDG 13Abstract
Nuclear science and technology are used in many countries to help meet development objectives in areas including energy, human health, food production, water management and environmental protection. The focus of this paper will be on energy and specifically how nuclear energy fits into SDG 7 (Affordable and clean energy) and relates to SDG 13 (Climate action). The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) were adopted by the United Nations in 2015 as a universal call to action to end poverty, protect the planet, and ensure that all people enjoy peace and prosperity by 2030. Sustainable Development Goal 7, Affordable and clean energy, aims to “Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all”, with a focus on developing countries. This goal classes “renewable” technologies to be sustainable, while excluding nuclear energy. The term "renewable" usually includes unsustainable, high carbon biofuel. From a policy point of view, it is a problematic term. According to multiple scientific bodies, nuclear energy is clean, reliable and is needed to transition away from fossil fuels in order to combat climate change. No country in the world has been able to decarbonise its electricity sector without having either nuclear energy or - where available - substantial hydro or geothermal energy as part of the energy mix. SDG 13, Climate action, focuses on lowering greenhouse gas emissions and adaptation to climate change. This goal does not mention nuclear energy. Significant research has shown that in the absence of suitable hydro or geothermal resources, decarbonisation aims are not achieved without nuclear energy. These issues will be discussed in this paper.
Literaturhinweise
➔ Ambient (outdoor) air quality and health. (2021, September22). Who.int; World HealthOrganization: WHO.https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ambient-(outdoor)-air-quality-and-health
➔ Angwin, M. (2020).Shorting the grid : the hiddenfragility of our electric grid. CarnotCommunications.
➔ Boom, D. V. (2021).What the US could learn from China’snuclear power expansion.CNET.https://www.cnet.com/science/why-the-us-should-learn-from-chinas-nuclear-power-expansion/
➔Bruckner, T. et al. (2014).Energy Systems. Climate Change 2014: Mitigation ofClimate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report ofthe Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
➔ Bruggink, J. J. C., & van der Zwaan, B. C. C. (2002). The role of nuclear energy inestablishing sustainable energy paths.InternationalJournal of Global Energy Issues(IJGEI),18(2/3/4). inderscience.http://www.inderscience.com/info/inarticle.php?artid=958
➔ Buchholz, K. (2022a, February 24).Infographic: WhichEuropean Countries Depend onRussian Gas?Statista Infographics.https://www.statista.com/chart/26768/dependence-on-russian-gas-by-european-country/
➔ Buchholz, K. (2022b, February 24).Infographic: WhichEuropean Countries Depend onRussian Gas?Statista Infographics.https://www.statista.com/chart/26768/dependence-on-russian-gas-by-european-country/
➔ California - State Energy Profile Analysis - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA).(2021). Eia.gov.https://www.eia.gov/state/analysis.php?sid=CA
➔ Chapter 4 — Global Warming of 1.5oC. (2018). Ipcc.ch; Intergovernmental Panel onClimate Change (IPCC).https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/chapter/chapter-4/
➔ Cheng, V. K. M., & Hammond, G. P. (2017). Life-cycle energy densities and land-takerequirements of various power generators: A UK perspective.Journal of the EnergyInstitute,90(2), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2016.02.003
➔ Chu, E., & Taranzano, L. (2019, April 22).A Brief History of Solar Panels. Smithsonian;Smithsonian.com.https://www.smithsonianmag.com/sponsored/brief-history-solar-panels-180972006/
➔ Clack, C. T. M., Qvist, S. A., Apt, J., Bazilian, M., Brandt, A. R., Caldeira, K., Davis, S. J.,Diakov, V., Handschy, M. A., Hines, P. D. H., Jaramillo, P., Kammen, D. M., Long, J. C. S.,Morgan, M. G., Reed, A., Sivaram, V., Sweeney, J., Tynan, G. R., Victor, D. G., & Weyant,J. P. (2017). Evaluation of a proposal for reliable low-cost grid power with 100% wind,water, and solar.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,114(26),6722–6727. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1610381114
➔ Clark, N. (2020, July 23).Is nuclear power a problemor a solution?Aljazeera.https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2020/7/23/is-nuclear-power-a-problem-or-a-solution
➔ Clifford, C. (2021, December 21).U.S. can get to100% clean energy with wind, water,solar and zero nuclear, Stanford professor says. CNBC.https://www.cnbc.com/2021/12/21/us-can-get-to-100percent-clean-energy-without-nuclear-power-stanford-professor-says.html
➔ Eden, S. (2004). Greenpeace.New Political Economy,9(4), 595–610.https://doi.org/10.1080/1356346042000311191
➔ Electricity production in the 1st half of 2021: coal most important energy source.(2021). Federal Statistical Office; Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis).
Journal of the European Institut for Multidisciplinary Studies on Human Rights & ScienceVolume 3, Issue 1, March 2022 | #RethinkProcessORIGINAL SOURCE ON:https://knowmadinstitut.org/2022/03/the-missing-role-of-nuclear-energy-in-the-sustainable-development-goals15https://www.destatis.de/EN/Press/2021/09/PE21_429_43312.html
➔ Fares, R. (2015, March 11).Renewable Energy Intermittency Explained: Challenges,Solutions, and Opportunities. Scientific American Blog Network.https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/plugged-in/renewable-energy-intermittency-explained-challenges-solutions-and-opportunities/
➔ Ford, J. (2022, March 17).Bloomberg - Are you a robot?Www.bloomberg.com.https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2022-03-17/ukraine-invasion-challenges-the-anti-nuclear-dogma-of-european-greens
➔ Fort Calhoun becomes fifth U.S. nuclear plant to retire in past five years. (2016).Www.eia.gov.https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=28572
➔ Gilbraith, N., Jaramillo, P., Tong, F., & Faria, F. (2013). Comments on Jacobson et al.'sproposal for a wind, water, and solar energy future for New York State.Energy Policy,60, 68–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.006
➔ Gregory, R., Lichtenstein, S., & Slovic, P. (1993). Valuing environmental resources: Aconstructive approach.Journal of Risk and Uncertainty,7(2), 177–197.https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01065813
➔ Hiltzik, M. (2018, February 23).Column: A Stanford professor drops his ridiculousdefamation lawsuit against his scientific critics. Los Angeles Times.https://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-hiltzik-jacobson-lawsuit-20180223-story.html
➔ Hirschberg, S., Bauer, C., Burgherr, P., Cazzoli, E., Heck, T., Spada, M., & Treyer, K.(2016). Health effects of technologies for power generation: Contributions fromnormal operation, severe accidents and terrorist threat.Reliability Engineering &System Safety,145, 373–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.09.013
➔ Hu, W. (2002, April 24). Post-9/11, Opposition to Indian Point Plant Grows.The NewYork Times.https://www.nytimes.com/2002/04/24/nyregion/post-9-11-opposition-to-indian-point-plant-grows.html➔IEA. (2019, May).Nuclear Power in a Clean Energy System – Analysis. IEA;International Energy Agency (IEA).https://www.iea.org/reports/nuclear-power-in-a-clean-energy-system
➔ India’s Nuclear Energy Boom | IBEF. (2021, December).Www.ibef.org; India BrandEquity Foundation.https://www.ibef.org/blogs/india-s-nuclear-energy-boom#:~:text=Nuclear%20energy%20is%20the%20fifth
➔ International Reactions to the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster: Summer Update | Article |EESI. (2011). Www.eesi.org; Environmental and Energy Study Institute (EESI).https://www.eesi.org/articles/view/international-reactions-to-the-fukushima-nuclear-disaster-summer-update
Journal of the European Institut for Multidisciplinary Studies on Human Rights & ScienceVolume 3, Issue 1, March 2022 | #RethinkProcessORIGINAL SOURCE ON:https://knowmadinstitut.org/2022/03/the-missing-role-of-nuclear-energy-in-the-sustainable-development-goals16
➔ Jacobson, M. et al. (2013).Examining the feasibility of converting New York State’sall-purpose energy infrastructure to one using wind, water, and sunlight,.Citeseerx.ist.psu.edu; Energy Policy.http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.367.1949&rep=rep1&type=pdf
➔ Jacobson, M. et al. (2017). 100% Clean and Renewable Wind, Water, and SunlightAll-Sector Energy Roadmaps for 139 Countries of the World. Instanford.edu.https://web.stanford.edu/group/efmh/jacobson/Articles/I/CountriesWWS.pdf
➔ Jamison, A. (2015, January 1).Science and SocialMovements(J. D. Wright, Ed.).ScienceDirect; Elsevier.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780080970868850229
➔ Jarvis, S., Deschenes, O., & Jha, A. (2019, December 19).The Private and ExternalCosts of Germany’s Nuclear Phase-Out. National Bureauof Economic ResearchWorking Paper Series.https://www.nber.org/papers/w26598
➔ Johnson, S. (2021, April 30).New York’s Indian Point nuclear power plant closes after59 years of operation - Today in Energy - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA).Www.eia.gov.https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=47776
➔ Kharecha, P. A., & Hansen, J. E. (2013). Prevented Mortality and Greenhouse GasEmissions from Historical and Projected Nuclear Power.Environmental Science &Technology,47(9), 4889–4895. https://doi.org/10.1021/es3051197
➔ Kikstra, J. S., Waidelich, P., Rising, J., Yumashev, D., Hope, C., & Brierley, C. M. (2021).The social cost of carbon dioxide under climate-economy feedbacks andtemperature variability.Environmental Research Letters,16(9), 094037.https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac1d0b
➔ Knapp die Hälfte der Deutschen ist grundsätzlich offen für Atomenergie. (2021).YouGov: What the World Thinks.https://yougov.de/news/2021/12/08/knapp-die-halfte-der-deutschen-ist-grundsatzlich-o/
➔ Life Cycle Assessment of Electricity Generation Options UNITED NATIONS ECONOMICCOMMISSION FOR EUROPE. (2021). United Nations Economic Commission forEurope (UNECE).https://unece.org/sites/default/files/2021-10/LCA-2.pdf
➔ Life cycle impacts of biomass electricity in 2020.(2014). GOV.UK; Department ofEnergy & Climate Change.https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/life-cycle-impacts-of-biomass-electricity-in-2020
➔PRIS - Country Details. (2022). Pris.iaea.org; InternationalAtomic Energy Agency(IAEA).https://pris.iaea.org/PRIS/CountryStatistics/CountryDetails.aspx?current=DE
➔ Public opposition to nuclear energy production. (2011).Our World in Data.https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/public-opposition-to-nuclear-energy-production
➔ Reuters. (2022, March 8). Germany vetoes nuclear power extension, aims for LNGterminal in 2024.Reuters.https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/german-ministries-say-cannot-recommend-extending-nuclear-plants-lifetime-2022-03-08/
➔ Ritchie, H. (2020, February 10).What Are the Safest Sources of energy?Our World inData.https://ourworldindata.org/safest-sources-of-energy
➔ Sep 20, P. par J. S. |, & Grid, 2019 |. (2019, September 20).RTE estime à 7 mds€ leraccordement de l’offshore marin d’ici à 2035. Énergies de La Mer.https://www.energiesdelamer.eu/2019/09/20/rte-estime-a-7-milliards-d-euros-le-raccordement-de-l-offshore-marin-d-ici-a-2025/
➔ Shahan, Z. (2014, November 21).History of Wind Turbines. Renewable Energy World.https://www.renewableenergyworld.com/storage/history-of-wind-turbines/#gref
➔ Sovacool, B. K., Schmid, P., Stirling, A., Walter, G., & MacKerron, G. (2020). Differencesin carbon emissions reduction between countries pursuing renewable electricityversus nuclear power.Nature Energy,5(11), 928–935.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-00696-3
➔ The Potential Role of Nuclear Energy in National Climate Change Mitigation Strategies.(2021, November 2). Www.iaea.org; International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).https://www.iaea.org/publications/15001/the-potential-role-of-nuclear-energy-in-national-climate-change-mitigation-strategies
➔ The Role of Nuclear Energy in Establishing Sustainable Development: EnergyPathways. (2019). United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) e.https://unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/energy/se/pp/CSE/2019/EnComm28_Sept.2019/26.Sept/King_Lee_Nuclear.pdf
➔ UCL. (2021, September 6).Economic cost of climate change could be six times higherthan previously thought. UCL News.https://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/2021/sep/economic-cost-climate-change-could-be-six-times-higher-previously-thought
➔ UK: load factor of solar PV 2010-2019. (2021). Statista.https://www.statista.com/statistics/555697/solar-electricity-load-factor-uk/
➔ United Nations. (2015).The 17 Goals. United Nations.https://sdgs.un.org/goals
➔ United Nations. (2021a).Goal 7 | Department of Economic and Social Affairs.Sdgs.un.org; United Nations.https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal7
➔ United Nations. (2021b).Goal 13 | Department of Economic and Social Affairs.Sdgs.un.org; United Nations.https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal13
➔ van de Ven, D.-J., Capellan-Peréz, I., Arto, I., Cazcarro, I., de Castro, C., Patel, P., &Gonzalez-Eguino, M. (2021). The potential land requirements and related land usechange emissions of solar energy.Scientific Reports,11(1), 2907.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82042-5
➔ Wang, J., & Kim, S. (2018). Comparative Analysis of Public Attitudes toward NuclearPower Energy across 27 European Countries by Applying the Multilevel Model.Sustainability,10(5), 1518. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051518
➔ Wigley, J. H., Kerry Emanuel, Ken Caldeira and Tom. (2015, December 3).Nuclearpower paves the only viable path forward on climate change. The Guardian.https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/dec/03/nuclear-power-paves-the-only-viable-path-forward-on-climate-change
Downloads
Veröffentlicht
Zitationsvorschlag
Ausgabe
Rubrik
Kategorien
URN
Lizenz
Copyright (c) 2022 Zion Lights
Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung - Nicht-kommerziell 4.0 International.
All authors who publish their work in this journal give their patrimonial rights in favor of the JMSHRS on a non-exclusive basis. This means that authors may enter into other independent and contractual agreements to disseminate their text published in this journal. Such as, for example, including it in an institutional, thematic or other repository, publishing it in a book, or other digital or physical media, as long as they explicitly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.
The responsibility for the content of each published work corresponds exclusively to the authors themselves, excluding the editors from any legal responsibility.
The contents of the journal will be disseminated under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). All issues are open access (OA) from the moment of publication.
