Deflection Encounters: Motivational Interviewing and Maximal Minutes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15230680Keywords:
Criminal justice, Deflection, motivational interviewing, opioid epidemic, pre-arrest deflection, law enforcement, racial equity, SDG, SDG 1, SDG 3, SDG 5, SDG 10, SDG 16Abstract
This article is a practice review for the application of Motivational Interviewing (MI) to be applied to First Responder Deflection programming. Deflection relies on law enforcement and a host of community responders to be the referral source to community-based drug treatment and mental health services prior to any potential crises or arrest. Deflection differs from the common term of diversion as it deflects those needing substance use or mental health services without an arrest and legal system processing. There is a short review of the innovative structure that Deflection has constructed and a brief examination of the delivery framework of this new approach. With over 1,000 sites of Deflection currently in operation, this practice review calls for the field to place more focus on what treatment mechanics are to be used. Specifically, the implementation and deployment of Motivational Interviewing is discussed by reviewing seven benefits. A question is asked of the field: Could MI be endowed as a best practice for deflection? A listing of several of these benefits include; Mi employs nonadversarial methods which syncs with the voluntary nature of Deflection along with the research that if MI is added to an existing evidence-based practice, MI increases the outcomes for both practices. Other benefits include MI doubles its effect size when used with minority populations; has effective resistance-lowering techniques; and MI is helpful when used with person’s challenged by post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and co-occurring conditions. Readers are asked to consider that the leading service that deflection programs link to is substance use disorder (SUD) treatment and medication assisted treatment (MAT). With that leading service connection, it is explained that MI can increase a client’s sense of importance to choose, comply, and continue with the use of MAT. This review moved further to report MI has been called an “effective tool” for use within short time frames and is notable for creating “potent opportunities” within first contacts. The term “maximal minutes” is coined in this review to speak to how the use of MI can help first meetings with clients that occur within compressed time frames.
References
Amrhein, P. C., Miller, W. R., Yahne, C. E., Palmer, M., & Fulcher, L. (2003). Client commitment language during motivational interviewing predicts drug use outcomes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 862–878.
Bohnert, A., Bonar, E., Cunningham, R., Greenwald, M., Thomas, L., Chermack, S., Blow, F., & Walton, M. (2016). A pilot randomized clinical trial of an intervention to reduce overdose risk behaviors among emergency department patients at risk for prescription opioid overdose. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 163, 40-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. drugalcdep.2016.03.018.
Bureau of Justice – BJA (May 13, 2021). Report of the national survey to assess first responder deflection programs in response to the opioid crisis. final report. https://bja.ojp.gov/library/publications/report-national-survey-assess-first-responder-deflection-programs-response
Bureau of Justice Assistance – BJA (2023). The six pathways: frameworks for implementing deflection to treatment, services, and recovery. https://bja.ojp.gov/library/publications/list?subtopic=71001&page=2
Charlier, J., (2021). Deflection: A powerful crime-fighting tool that improves community relations. Police Chiefs magazine. International Association of Chiefs of Police. https://www.policechiefmagazine.org/deflection-a-powerful-crime-fighting-tool-that-improves-community-relations/
Clark, M. D., (2020).Empowering Risk Reduction: Increasing responsivity with motivational interviewing. Advancing Corrections - Journal of the International Corrections and Prison Association. (10), 98-112.
Clark, M.D., (2021-2024). Training Motivational Interviewing (MI) and MI training-of- trainers to 38 counties in Pennsylvania. County Chief Adult Probation and Parole Officers Association of Pennsylvania. [Unpublished raw data]. Center for Strength-based Strategies.
Clark, M.D., & Chandler, T., (2022). There may not be tomorrow: Immediacy, motivational interviewing, and opioid intervention courts. Federal Probation, 86(2), 18–22.
Consalo, M. (2024). The model law enforcement officer and other first responder’s deflection act: A national blueprint for creating successful deflection programs across the country. UMKC Law Review, 92(3), 555–592.
Diskin, K. M., & Hodgins, D.C., (2009). A randomized controlled trial of a single session motivational intervention for concerned gamblers. Behavior Research and Therapy, 47, 382-388.
Ekelund, B. (2019). Training for First Responder Diversion Programs [Webinar}. TASC, Inc. (Treatment Alternatives for Safe Communities). Chicago IL 60607. https://bja.ojp.gov/library/publications/law-enforcement-and-first-responder- deflection-pathways-deflection-case
Forman, D. P., & Moyers, T. P. (2019). With odds of a single session, motivational interviewing is a good bet. Psychotherapy, 56(1), 62–66. https://doi.apa.org/doi/10.1037/pst0000199
Legislative Analysis and Public Policy Association. (2023, July 17). Deflection and the deflection pathways. Legislative Analysis and Public Policy Association. https://legislativeanalysis.org/deflection-and-the-deflection-pathways/
Lewis-Fernandez, R., Coombs, A., Balan, I., et al. (2018). Motivational Interviewing: Overcoming disparities in pharmacotherapy engagement. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 79(3),18ac12150
Lundahl, B., Droubay, B. A., Burke, B., Butters, R. P., Nelford, K., Hardy, C., ... & Bowles, M. (2019). Motivational interviewing adherence tools: A scoping review investigating content validity. Patient education and counseling, 102(12), 2145-2155.
McCambridge, J., Strang, J. (2004). The efficacy of single-session motivational interviewing in reducing drug consumption and perceptions of drug-related risk and harm among young people: Results from a multi-site cluster randomized trial. Addiction, 99, 39-52.
Miller, W. R. (2018, October). Conference plenary—Motivational Interviewing: A metamorphosis. Symposium conducted at the 2018 International meeting of the Motivational Interviewing Network of Trainers—MINT Forum. New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
Miller, W. R. (2024). Controlled clinical trials involving Motivational Interviewing—up-dated 6/1/2019. Unpublished manuscript.
Miller, W. R., & Mount, K. A. (2001). A small study of training in motivational interviewing: Does one workshop change clinician and client behavior? Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 29(4), 457-471.
Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (1991). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people to change addictive behavior. New York: Guilford Press.
Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2013). Motivational Interviewing: Helping people change (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press. p. 207.
Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2023). Motivational Interviewing: Helping people grow and change (4th ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
Moore, M., Flamez, B., & Szirony, G. M. (2018). Motivational interviewing and dual diagnosis clients: Enhancing self-efficacy and treatment completion. Journal of Substance Use, 23(3), 247–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 14659891.2017.1388856
Motivational Interviewing and Intimate Partner Violence Workgroup. (2010). Guiding as practice: Motivational interviewing and trauma-informed work with survivors of intimate partner violence. Partner Abuse 1(1), 92–104. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.1.1.92
Moyers, T. B., & Martin, T. (2006). Therapist influence on client language during motivational interviewing sessions. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 30(3), 245-251.
Moyers, T. B., Martin, T., Houck, J. M., Christopher, P. J., & Tonigan, J. S. (2009). From in-session behaviors to drinking outcomes: A causal chain for motivational interviewing. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77(6), 1113–1124.
Moyers, T. B., Martin, T., Christopher, P. J., Houck, J. M., Tonigan, J. S., & Amrhein, P. C. (2007). Client language as a mediator of motivational interviewing efficacy: Where is the evidence? Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 31(10, Suppl.), 40s–47s.
Moyers, T. B., Martin, T., Houck, J. M., Christopher, P. J., & Tonigan, J. S. (2009). From in-session behaviors to drinking outcomes: A causal chain for motivational interviewing. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77(6), 1113– 1124.
Moyers, T. (2015). MINT Oceanic (producer). Beyond motivational interviewing: What MI has contributed to the broader field of psychotherapy. [Workshop podcast]. Retrieved from https://vimeo.com/137430269
Moyers, T. B., Rowell, L. N., Manuel, J. K., Ernst, D., & Houck, J. M. (2016). The motivational interviewing treatment integrity code (MITI 4): Rationale, preliminary reliability and validity. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 65, 36–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jsat.2016.01.001.
Murphy, J., & Kruis, N. (2023). Emotional Exhaustion and Turnover Intentions among Counselors in Rural Substance Use Disorder Treatment Programs. Substance Use & Misuse, 58(2), 180–187. https://doi-org.proxy1.cl.msu.edu/10.1080/10826084.2022.2151314
Muthulingam, D., Bia, J., Madden, L. M., & Farnum, S. O. (2019). Using nominal group technique to identify barriers, facilitators, and preferences among patients seeking treatment for opioid use disorder: A needs assessment for decision-making support. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 100,18-28.
NREPP. Motivational Interviewing. Intervention summary retrieved on April 15, 2013, from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration’s National Registry of Evidence-based Programs and Practices, http://www.nrepp.samhsa.gov/ViewIntervention.aspx?id=130
Pew-MacArthur Results First Initiative. (2015, March). Issue Brief: Legislating Evidence-Based Policymaking: A look at state laws that support data-driven decision-making. Pew-MacArthur Results First Initiative. https://www.pewtrusts.org/~/media/assets/2015/03/legislationresultsfirstbrief march2015.pdf
Police Treatment and Community Collaborative – PTACC. (November 14, 2024) News Release. FINAL press-release BJA-award-to-PTACC 11-14-24.pdf. https://ptaccollaborative.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/FINAL_press- release_BJA-award-to-PTACC_11-14-24.pdf
Ross. J. & Taylor, B., (2022) Designed to Do Good: Key Findings on the Development and Operation of First Responder Deflection Programs. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice 28(Supplement 6):p S295-S301, November/December 2022. | DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001578
Stinson, J., & Clark, M. D. (2017). Motivational interviewing with offenders: Engagement, rehabilitation, and reentry. NY: Guilford Press.
United States Department of Substance Abuse and Mental Health Administration SAMHSA). (2011). http:// www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/2011MHFDT/2k11MHFR/Web/NS- DUHmhfr2011.htm#Ch4
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
URN
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Michael Clark
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All authors who publish their work in this journal give their patrimonial rights in favor of the JMSHRS on a non-exclusive basis. This means that authors may enter into other independent and contractual agreements to disseminate their text published in this journal. Such as, for example, including it in an institutional, thematic or other repository, publishing it in a book, or other digital or physical media, as long as they explicitly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.
The responsibility for the content of each published work corresponds exclusively to the authors themselves, excluding the editors from any legal responsibility.
The contents of the journal will be disseminated under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). All issues are open access (OA) from the moment of publication.
