PROGRESS REPORT Global Country Policy Review: A humanitarian comparative analysis on drug policies, on the basis of the Rome Consensus 2.0

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10805514

Keywords:

Drug Policy, Política de Drogas, Drogen Politik, Abuso de Drogas, Drug Abuse, Schadensminimierung, Drogenmissbrauch, Drogenkonsum, Drug use, Consumo de drogas , Delitos no violentos relacionados con drogas, Non-violent drug-related crimes , Nicht gewalttätige Drogenkriminalität , Harm Reduction , Reducción de Daños

Abstract

This report advances our global understanding of drug policy by focusing on two key components: a bibliometric analysis and the creation of preliminary country profiles. We aim to identify trends, challenges, and opportunities within drug policy globally, emphasizing how these aspects can be better aligned with humanitarian principles, Rome Consensus 2.0, and Sustainable Development. Importantly, as the world has recognized the inability of the War on Drugs as a strategy to reduce drug use or drug-related crime, which is to say, to make us more safe and healthier (the two aims of the War on Drugs), this Project provides a new vision for where nations can go next that achieves the desired public safety and public health aspects all peoples want to see in their own communities and countries.

Drawing from the preliminary insights, the report advocates for a more holistic and evidence-driven approach to drug policy. This entails broadening support for harm reduction, improving treatment services and the professional workforce, encouraging international collaboration to address the challenges of the transnational illicit drug trade, and reassessing policies that perpetuate stigma. Serving as an overview for the upcoming Global Policy Review (GPR), this report emphasizes the importance of drug policy frameworks that respect human dignity and contribute to achieving Sustainable Development Goals, with intentions to expand the review to more UN member states and provide bi-annual updates.

Author Biographies

Andres M. Pérez-Acosta, Universidad del Rosario

Director of the Observatory of Self-medication Behavior, Psychology Department, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad del Rosario, Bogota, Colombia. Editorial Director of the Knowmad Institut.

Carlos Esteban Convers-Baena, Universidad del Rosario

Psychologist graduated from Universidad Del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia. Master in Clinical Psychology from Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogota, Colombia. Psychotherapist, Assistant researcher of the Observatory of Self-medication Behavior. Editorial assistant of Pserinfo.

David Bruna, European Institute for Multidisciplinary Studies on Human Rights and Science - Knowmad Institut

Bachelor in Philosophy and Liberal Arts, and Diploma in Citizen Security, graduated from Universidad Alberto Hurtado, Santiago, Chile. Diploma in Political Communication, Universidad de Montevideo, Uruguay. Student of MSc in Politics, Economics & Philosophy, Universität Hamburg, Germany.  Member of Expert Committee in Knowmad Institut - European Institute for Multidisciplinary Studies on Human Rights and Sciences.

Jorge Manuel Molina Aguilar, Universidad Luterana Salvadoreña

Associate Academic Researcher at the Universidad Luterana Salvadoreña, Co-Director of the Self-Medication Behavior Observatory of the Universidad Del Rosario (Bogota, Colombia) and Member of the Ethics Committee of the Knowmad Institut.

 

References

American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000165-000

Babor, T. F., Caulkins, J. P., Edwards, G., Fischer, B., Foxcroft, D. R., Humphreys, K., Obot, I. S., Rehm, J., Reuter, P., Room, R., Rossow, I., & Strang, J. (2009). Drug Policy and the Public Good. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199557127.001.0001

Barrett, D., & Nowak, M. (2009, August 25). The United Nations and Drug Policy: Towards a Human Rights-Based Approach. Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1461445

Bilde, D. (2023, April). Parliamentary question | Drug trafficking in the Balkans, in particular in Albania | E-001230/2023 | European Parliament. Www.europarl.europa.eu. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-9-2023-001230_EN.html#:~:text=Albania%20is%20one%20of%20the

Brnadv, H., & EMCDDA (2022, December). Cannabis cultivation and trafficking in the Western Balkans | www.emcdda.europa.eu. Www.emcdda.europa.eu. https://www.emcdda.europa.eu/drugs-library/cannabis-cultivation-and-trafficking-western-balkans_en

CoARA - Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment (n.d.). CoARA. Retrieved October 6, 2023, from https://coara.eu/

Criminality in Algeria - The Organized Crime Index | ENACT. (2023). The Organized Crime Index. https://africa.ocindex.net/country/algeria

Database of Legislation. (2023). : https://sherloc.unodc.org/cld/v3/sherloc/legdb/search.html?lng=en#?c=%7B%22filters%22:%5B%7B%22fieldName%22:%22en%23__el.legislation.crimeTypes_s%22,%22value%22:%22Drug%20offences%22%7D%5D,%22sortings%22:%22%22%7D

Díaz Velásquez , M. I., Espin García, O. H., Bruna Ortiz , D., Fonseca, P. S., Moncada Bellorin, L., Kreher , D., & Paladines, J. V. (2022). Ad Hoc Committee to elaborate a comprehensive international convention on countering the use of information and communication technologies for criminal purposes. Third session: International cooperation, technical assistance, prevention measures, and the mechanism of implementation. In UNODC. https://www.unodc.org/documents/Cybercrime/AdHocCommittee/Second_session/Documents/Knowad_E_3rd_session.pdf

Díaz Velásquez, M. I. (2023). β V 0.01 | Mapping the Scope of the Rome Consensus 2.0: A Comprehensive Digital Analysis - uMap [Map]. In umap.openstreetmap.fr. Knowmad Institut - The European Institute for Multidisciplinary Studies on Human Rights and Science. https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/es/map/v-001-mapping-the-scope-of-the-rome-consensus-20-a_897393#4/43.17/8.09 . | https://linktr.ee/knowmadinstitut .

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

Dunn, W. N. (2018). Public policy analysis: an integrated approach. Routledge. https://accord.edu.so/course/material/public-policy-and-analysis-480/pdf_content (Original work published 2006)

Emanuel, E. J., Wendler, D., & Grady, C. (2000). What Makes Clinical Research Ethical? JAMA, 283(20), 2701. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.20.2701

EMCDDA. (2023). European Drug Report 2023: Trends and Developments. https://www.emcdda.europa.eu/publications/european-drug-report/2023_en

Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and Weaknesses. The FASEB Journal, 22(2), 338–342. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492lsf

Global Health Research and Policy (n.d.). BioMed Central. Retrieved October 6, 2023, from https://ghrp.biomedcentral.com/

HRC (2023). Human rights challenges in addressing and countering all aspects of the world drug problem | A/HRC/54/53. In United Nations. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G23/156/03/PDF/G2315603.pdf?OpenElement

Hughes, C. E., & Stevens, A. (2010). What Can We Learn From The Portuguese Decriminalization of Illicit Drugs? British Journal of Criminology, 50(6), 999–1022. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azq038

Krippendorff, K. (2019). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878781

McKenzie, J. (2023). Grey literature: What it is & how to find it | SFU Library. https://www.lib.sfu.ca/help/research-assistance/format-type/grey-literature

Montazeri, A., Mohammadi, S., M.Hesari, P., Marjan, G. & Sheikhi-Mobarakeh, Z. (2023). Preliminary guideline for reporting bibliometric reviews of the biomedical literature (BIBLIO): a minimum requirements. Syst Rev 12, (239). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02410-2

Nisar, T. M., Prabhakar, G., & Strakova, L. (2019). Social media information benefits, knowledge management and smart organizations. Journal of Business Research, 94(1), 264–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.005

Organized crime in the Western Balkans. (2020). Trends in Organized Crime, 11(4), 430–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12117-008-9050-0

RC2. (2020). Documents – Rome Consensus 2.0: Towards a Humanitarian Drug Policy. Rome Consensus 2.0. https://romeconsensus.com/documents/

Seddon, T. (2014). Drug policy and global regulatory capitalism: The case of new psychoactive substances (NPS). International Journal of Drug Policy, 25(5), 1019–1024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.03.009

Tennant, J. P., Waldner, F., Jacques, D. C., Masuzzo, P., Collister, L. B., & Hartgerink, Chris. H. J. (2016). The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review. F1000Research, 5, 632. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.8460.3

The Sustainable Development Report (2023). Sustainable Development Report 2023 Afghanistan. Dashboards.sdgindex.org. https://dashboards.sdgindex.org/profiles/afghanistan

UNDP (2016). Reflections On Drug Policy And Its Impact On Human Development: Innovative Approaches By Member States | United Nations Development Programme. UNDP. https://www.undp.org/publications/reflections-drug-policy-and-its-impact-human-development-innovative-approaches-member-states

UNGASS 2016: Time for a New Paradigm in Drugs (2016). Council of Councils. https://www.cfr.org/councilofcouncils/global-memos/ungass-2016-time-new-paradigm-drugs

UNODC (2022, November 1). Afghanistan opium cultivation in 2022 up by 32 per cent: UNODC survey. United Nations : Office on Drugs and Crime. https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/press/releases/2022/November/afghanistan-opium-cultivation-in-2022-up-by-32-per-cent_-unodc-survey.html

UNODC (2023). World Drug Report 2023. United Nations : Office on Drugs and Crime. https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/data-and-analysis/world-drug-report-2023.html

UNODC / SHERLOC. (n.d.). Database of Legislation. Sherloc.unodc. Retrieved November 1, 2023, from https://sherloc.unodc.org/cld/v3/sherloc/legdb/search.html?lng=en#?c=%7B%22filters%22:%5B%7B%22fieldName%22:%22en%23legislation@country_label_s%22

Walker, I., & Netherland, J. (2018). Developing a Transformative Drug Policy Research Agenda in the United States. Contemporary Drug Problems, 46(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091450918811178

Wang, Y., Rao, Y., Yin, Y., Li, Y., Lin, Z., & Zhang, B. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of global trends in the research field of pharmaceutical care over the past 20 years. Frontiers in Public Health, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.980866

Zambrano, D. (2023, October 5). Global drug policy: the transition from “crime and punishment” to safeguarding human rights. Dejusticia. https://www.dejusticia.org/en/global-drug-policy-transition-to-safeguarding-human-rights/

Published

2024-03-11

How to Cite

Díaz Velásquez, M. I., Pérez-Acosta, A. M., Convers-Baena, C. E., Bruna, D., & Molina Aguilar, J. M. (2024). PROGRESS REPORT Global Country Policy Review: A humanitarian comparative analysis on drug policies, on the basis of the Rome Consensus 2.0. Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Human Rights and Science, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10805514

URN